Accurate estimates of population effect size are critical to empirical science, for both reporting experimental results and conducting a priori power analyses. Unfortunately, the current most-popular measure of standardized effect size, partial eta squared ([Formula: see text]), is known to have positive bias. Two less-biased alternatives, partial epsilon squared ([Formula: see text]) and partial omega squared ([Formula: see text]), have both existed for decades, but neither is often employed. Given that researchers appear reluctant to abandon [Formula: see text], this article provides a simple method for removing bias from this measure, to produce a value referred to as adjusted partial eta squared (adj [Formula: see text]). Some of the many benefits of adopting this measure are briefly discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. Toby Mordkoff (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: