Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: While trophectoderm (TE) biopsy with next-generation sequencing (NGS) remains the gold standard for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), the discovery of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in spent culture media (SCM) has sparked interest in non-invasive PGT-A (NiPGT-A) as a potential alternative. Aim: The study was conducted to assess the feasibility of cell cfDNA from SCM as a tool for NiPGT-A in patients undergoing IVF for advanced age, repeated implantation failure or severe male factor infertility. Settings and Design: This is a prospective study where a total of 44 embryos having TE biopsy for aneuploidy testing and their respective SCM collected at day 5/6 were analysed. Materials and Methods: All aneuploid blastocysts (WB) were subjected to DNA extraction and amplification using Sureplex DNA amplification system followed by library preparation using VeriSeq™ PGS Library Prep kit and sequencing on MiSeq (Illumina, California, USA). Statistical Analysis Used: Copy Number Variation visualisation and analysis were carried out using BlueFuse Multi Software (Illumina). The statistical data were analysed by STATA version 14. Results: Informative results were obtained in 36/44 (81.2%) SCM samples. The reads were analysable in 26 paired (SCM and TE biopsy) samples. Concordant NGS results for both TE biopsy and SCM sample were obtained in 17/26 (65.38%) embryos. The per chromosome concordance rate was 85.13% (487/572) and the sex chromosome concordance rate was 73% (19/26). The sensitivity and specificity of NiPGT-A were 66.6% and 60%, respectively. On comparing the ploidy concordance rate, poor morphology embryos had better, but not statistically significant concordance rate (83.33%) as compared to good morphology embryos (50%, P = 0.16). Although not significant, day 6 embryos had better per chromosome as well as sex chromosome concordance rate as compared to day 5 embryos. Conclusion: Aneuploidy testing using cf DNA in SCM is a promising technique but needs more research on larger cohort size to improve the sensitivity, specificity and concordance rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: