Key result
Residual stenosis after CAS is linked to ~9% higher restenosis risk per percentage point.
Why the study?
What are the clinical, radiological, and procedural predictors of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting?
Cohort (n=189)
No
What are the clinical, radiological, and procedural predictors of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting?
Residual stenosis and multiple stent deployment are strong independent predictors of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting, highlighting the importance of adequate vessel recanalization.
May identify patients for intensified post-stent surveillance; leaves open whether optimizing recanalization reduces restenosis risk.
Purpose. The long-term efficacy of carotid artery stenting is debated. Predictors of stent restenosis are not fully investigated. Our aim was to assess the incidence of long term restenosis after CAS and to identify some predictors of restenosis. Methods. We retrospectively selected 189 treated patients and we obtained the survival Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival, for freedom from stroke or death and from restenosis. To correlate clinical, radiological, and procedural variables to stent restenosis, an univariate analysis was performed while to determine independent predictors of restenosis, a multivariate analysis was applied. Results. At 1, 3, and 5 years, the cumulative overall survival rate was 98%, 94%, and 92% with a cumulative primary patency rate of 87%, 82.5%, and 82.5%. The percentage residual stenosis after CAS and multiple stents deployment were independent predictors of restenosis, while diabetes and tumors are suggestive but not significant predictors of restenosis. Conclusions. In our CAS experience, encouraging long-term results seem to derive from both neurological event free rate and restenosis incidence. Adequate recanalization of the treated vessel is important to limit the development of stent restenosis. Multiple stents deployment, and with less evidence, diabetes, or neoplasms has to be considered to facilitate restenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cosottini et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Carotid artery stenosis (n=189). Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting vs. Lower residual stenosis was evaluated on In-stent restenosis (HR 1.091, 95% CI 1.050-1.130, p=<0.0001). Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting was a strong independent predictor of long-term restenosis, with the risk increasing by 9.1% (HR 1.091) per percent unit of residual stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: