Why the study?
Does distal vessel diameter predict adverse outcomes in patients undergoing long coronary artery stenting?
Does distal vessel diameter predict adverse outcomes in patients undergoing long coronary artery stenting?
In patients undergoing long coronary artery stenting, a distal vessel diameter <2.5 mm is a powerful predictor of subacute thrombosis or restenosis.
Procedural and 6-mo clinical outcomes were evaluated in 34 consecutive patients who had stenting (<40 mm) of a long segment of coronary artery. Procedural success was achieved in 32 (96%) patients. Before stenting, 32 (96%) patients had Canadian Cardiovascular Society Class 3 or 4 angina compared to 7 (21%) at 6-mo follow-up (P<0.001). Eleven patients (32%) suffered either acute/subacute stent thrombosis (n=4) or restenosis (n=7). On logistic regression distal reference diameter <2.5 mm (odds ratio 26, P<0.01) and previous cardiac intervention (odds ratio 9.0, P<0.01) were independent predictors of a major adverse event during follow-up. There was no significant association between outcome and indication for stenting, type of stent, or use of ticlopidine and aspirin. These results indicate that distal vessel diameter <2.5 mm is a powerful predictor of subacute thrombosis or restenosis after long coronary artery stenting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kerr et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: