Experimental study demonstrates improved stationary alignment accuracy in attitude reference systems, highlighting enhanced resilience against hard-iron magnetic disturbances.
This paper revisits the stationary alignment problem of attitude and heading reference systems (AHRSs). The investigation is initiated from the three-axis attitude determination (TRIAD)–based method, purposely chosen to use nonunitary/nonorthogonal observations of the local gravity and Earth’s magnetic flux density vectors. For the simplifying assumption of body and navigation frames aligned, a comprehensive error analysis is developed, providing additional insight into the problem. Closed-form formulas for the residual normality and orthogonality errors are used to devise innovative pseudo-bias estimation (PBE) algorithms for the - and -axis magnetometer biases, as well as for the -axis accelerometer bias. As a direct consequence of applying the latter, and also figuring as the main contribution of this paper, an improved (more accurate) AHRS stationary alignment approach is obtained, herein called TRIAD-PBE. The error analysis is extended to representative state-of-the-art attitude determination techniques, confirming the relevance of TRIAD-PBE, especially in the presence of hard-iron magnetism. Results from simulated and experimental tests confirm the adequacy of the outlined verifications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: