Patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction without standard modifiable risk factors had a significantly higher risk of 30-day cardiovascular mortality compared to those with risk factors (HR 1.48).
Cohort (n=8,680)
No
Does the absence of standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRF-less) increase 30-day cardiovascular mortality in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction?
Patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction without standard modifiable risk factors represent a high-risk subgroup with significantly worse short-term cardiovascular mortality compared to those with traditional risk factors.
Estimación del efecto: HR 1.48 (95% CI 1.09-1.86)
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 10.7% vs 6.1%
valor p: p=0.048
Background An increasing proportion of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are presenting without standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs) of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, and smoking, but with an unexpectedly increased mortality. This study examined the SMuRF-less patients presenting with AMI in a multiethnic Asian population. Methods We recruited patients presenting with AMI from 2011 to 2021 and compared the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of SMuRF-less and SMuRF patients. Multivariable analysis was used to compare the outcomes of 30-day cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, readmission, cardiogenic shock, stroke, and heart failure. Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed for 30-day cardiovascular mortality, with stratification by ethnicity, gender and AMI type, and 10-year all-cause mortality. Results Standard modifiable risk factor-less patients, who made up 8.6% of 8,680 patients, were significantly younger with fewer comorbidities that include stroke and chronic kidney disease, but higher rates of ventricular arrhythmias and inotropic or invasive ventilation requirement. Multivariable analysis showed higher rates of cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.48, 95% CI: 1.09–1.86, p = 0.048), cardiogenic shock (RR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.09–1.52, p = 0.015), and stroke (RR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.67–3.34, p = 0.030) among SMuRF-less patients. A 30-day cardiovascular mortality was raised in the SMuRF-less group, with similar trends in men, patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and the three Asian ethnicities. All-cause mortality remains increased in the SMuRF-less group for up to 5 years. Conclusion There is a significant proportion of patients with AMI without standard risk factors in Asia, who have worse short-term mortality. This calls for greater focus on the management of this unexpectedly high-risk subgroup of patients.
Kong et al. (Tue,) conducted a cohort in Acute Myocardial Infarction (n=8,680). Absence of standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRF-less) vs. Presence of ≥1 standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRF) was evaluated on 30-day cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.09-1.86, p=0.048). Patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction without standard modifiable risk factors had a significantly higher risk of 30-day cardiovascular mortality compared to those with risk factors (HR 1.48).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: