Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 26, 2006Journal of AnatomyOpen Access

Differences between sliding semi‐landmark methods in geometric morphometrics, with an application to human craniofacial and dental variation

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SPS. Iván PérezConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasVBValeria BernalConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasPGPaula GonzálezMet Office

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Pérez et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c56b1ea84844e355fc0a2https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00576.x
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1R: A Language for Data Analysis and Graphics1996 · 10,492 citations
  2. 2Geometric Morphometrics in Primatology: Craniofacial Variation in Homo sapiens and Pan troglodytes1996 · 57 citations
  3. 3A COMPARISON OF GENETIC AND PHENOTYPIC CORRELATIONS1988 · 849 citations
  4. 4An apportionment of human DNA diversity1997 · 500 citations