Key result
Prolonged QTc interval independently predicted arrhythmic events (OR 1.085) and in-hospital mortality (OR 1.116) in patients with decompensated heart failure and systolic dysfunction.
Why the study?
Previous studies tended to evaluate repolarization indicators alone; this study aimed to elucidate their prognostic utility before and after modifying confounding parameters in decompensated heart failure with systolic dysfunction.
Do prolonged QTc interval and QT dispersion predict arrhythmic events and mortality in patients with decompensated heart failure and systolic dysfunction?
Cohort (n=165)
No
Do prolonged QTc interval and QT dispersion predict arrhythmic events and mortality in patients with decompensated heart failure and systolic dysfunction?
QTc interval is an independent predictor of arrhythmic events, in-hospital mortality, and long-term sudden cardiac death in patients with decompensated heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.
QTc monitoring may refine risk assessment in decompensated systolic HF; leaves open prospective validation for clinical use.
Background: Ventricular repolarization measurement by QTc interval and QT dispersion can recognize high-risk patients. Previous research tended to evaluate the act of repolarization indicators alone but this study aimed to elucidate their prognostic utility before and after modifying confounding parameters in risk stratification of different aspects of prognosis in decompensated heart failure patients with systolic dysfunction. Methods: Data of 98 variables were evaluated to determine their predictive value concerning arrhythmic events, in-hospital, and long-term mortality. Results: From 858 cases that presented with acute heart failure, 19.2% (n=165) were enrolled in the study. During hospitalization, arrhythmic events and cardiac-related mortality occurred in 56(33.9%) and 11(7%) patients, respectively. QTc and QT dispersion were independent predictors of arrhythmia and in-hospital mortality after adjustment of the variables (arrhythmic events: QTc interval OR 1.085, P=0.007, QT dispersion OR 1.077, P=0.007, in-hospital mortality: QTc interval OR 1.116, P=0.009, QT dispersion OR 1.067, P=0.011). After being discharged, they were tracked for 181±56 days. Within the 16 deaths in follow-up time, 6 sudden cardiac deaths were documented. Cox regression, defined QTc as the predictor of all-cause and sudden death mortality (all-cause: HR 1.041, 95% CI 1.015-1.067, P=0.002; sudden death: HR 1.063, 95% CI 1.023-1.105, P=0.002); nevertheless, efforts to demonstrate QT dispersion as the predictor failed. Conclusion: The predictive nature of QT parameters was significant after modification of the variables; therefore, they should be measured for risk stratification of ventricular repolarization arrhythmia and death in decompensated heart failure patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hatamnejad et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Decompensated heart failure with ventricular systolic dysfunction (n=165). QTc interval was evaluated on Arrhythmic events during hospitalization (OR 1.085, 95% CI 1.023-1.151, p=0.007). Prolonged QTc interval independently predicted arrhythmic events (OR 1.085) and in-hospital mortality (OR 1.116) in patients with decompensated heart failure and systolic dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: