Key result
Low-consistency HbA1c testing is linked to ~16% higher risk of MACE or death.
Why the study?
Does consistent annual hemoglobin A1c testing reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in older Medicare patients with diabetes mellitus?
Cohort (n=1,574,415)
Does consistent annual hemoglobin A1c testing reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in older Medicare patients with diabetes mellitus?
Hazard Ratio: 1.16 (95% CI 1.15–1.17)
Absolute Event Rate: 62.3% vs 49%
Absolute Risk Reduction: 13.2%
p-value: p=<0.001
Consistent annual hemoglobin A1c testing in older patients with diabetes is associated with a significantly lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and death.
Consistent HbA1c testing may warrant emphasis in older diabetes patients; leaves open whether improving consistency causally reduces MACE.
BACKGROUND: Annual hemoglobin A1c testing is recommended for patients with diabetes mellitus. However, it is unknown how consistently patients with diabetes mellitus receive hemoglobin A1c testing over time, or whether testing consistency is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 1 574 415 Medicare patients (2002-2012) with diabetes mellitus over the age of 65. We followed each patient for a minimum of 3 years to determine their consistency in hemoglobin A1C testing, using 3 categories: low (testing in 0 or 1 of 3 years), medium (testing in 2 of 3 years), and high (testing in all 3 years). In unweighted and inverse propensity-weighted cohorts, we examined associations between testing consistency and major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as death, myocardial infarction, stroke, amputation, or the need for leg revascularization. Overall, 70.2% of patients received high-consistency testing, 17.6% of patients received medium-consistency testing, and 12.2% of patients received low-consistency testing. When compared to high-consistency testing, low-consistency testing was associated with a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events or death in unweighted analyses (hazard ratio [HR]=1.21; 95% CI, 1.20-1.23; P<0.001), inverse propensity-weighted analyses (HR=1.16; 95% CI, 1.15-1.17; P<0.001), and weighted analyses limited to patients who had at least 4 physician visits annually (HR=1.15; 95% CI, 1.15-1.16; P<0.001). Less-consistent testing was associated with worse results for each cardiovascular outcome and in analyses using all years as the exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent annual hemoglobin A1c testing is associated with fewer adverse cardiovascular outcomes in this observational cohort of Medicare patients of diabetes mellitus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goodney et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Diabetes mellitus (n=1,574,415). Low-consistency hemoglobin A1c testing vs. High-consistency hemoglobin A1c testing was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, amputation, or need for leg revascularization) (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.15-1.17, p=<0.001). Low-consistency annual hemoglobin A1c testing was associated with a 16% higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events or death compared to high-consistency testing (HR 1.16).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: