This article examines several key tensions in thesymbolic legality or social representation of our society's core legal values. It argues that present Fourteenth Amendment jurisprudence ignores the realities of contemporary social life and serves up ineffective due process protections as poor substitutes for genuine or meaningful equal protection remedies. By documenting the importance situation and context and verifying the limits of due process, social science data underscore the rift between social reality and equal protection rhetoric and thereby increase existing tensions in the symbolic legality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Craig Haney (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: