Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Practical quantum communication (QC) protocols are assumed to be secure provided implemented devices are properly characterized and all known side channels are closed. We show that this is not always true. We demonstrate a laser-damage attack capable of modifying device behavior on demand. We test it on two practical QC systems for key distribution and coin tossing, and show that newly created deviations lead to side channels. This reveals that laser damage is a potential security risk to existing QC systems, and necessitates their testing to guarantee security.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Makarov et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: