This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective This is a cross-sectional study that compares the sales of “healthy” and “unhealthy” vending machines following the introduction of healthier vending machines on a university campus. Method: Healthy (“green” and “amber” category), competitively priced snacks and beverages in vending machines (n = 4) called Grab Goodness were placed alongside standard vending machines (n = 11). The monthly sales data from all vending machines were captured electronically for 20 months. Results: Assortment of snacks and beverages offered by standard vending machines were of low nutritional quality, with only 16% of all products categorized as “green.” The new Grab Goodness machines accounted for 28% of all vending machine purchases over 20 months, and 50% of all products purchased through these machines were “green” category items. Conclusions: The purchases of healthier snack options demonstrate encouraging patterns that support more nutritious and healthy alternatives in vending machines.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roy et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: