Key result
Early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion was associated with a significantly higher risk of overall AF recurrence (HR 1.7, P=0.03).
Why the study?
Does early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation predict the time course of AF recurrence in patients after successful internal cardioversion?
Cohort (n=124)
Does early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation predict the time course of AF recurrence in patients after successful internal cardioversion?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ERAF and long AF duration are independent predictors of AF recurrence after successful internal cardioversion, with ERAF predicting early recurrence and long AF duration predicting late recurrence.
Early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation (ERAF) was commonly observed after successful electrical cardioversion, however, the effect of ERAF on the subsequent time course of arrhythmia recurrence remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical predictors and time course of AF recurrence with respect to the occurrence of ERAF after successful cardioversion. The clinical predictors and time course of AF recurrence were prospectively evaluated in 124 patients (94 men, 30 women; mean age 65 +/- 9 years) with persistent AF (mean AF duration 36 +/- 40 months), who underwent internal cardioversion. After cardioversion, all patients received treatment with sotalol and were monitored for AF recurrence. Successful restoration of sinus rhythm was achieved in 104 (84%) of 124 patients. ERAF was observed in 28 (27%) of 104 patients in whom 26 of them were successfully treated acutely with intravenous sotalol and repeated cardioversion. After a mean follow-up of 26 months, 29 (28%) of 104 patients remained in sinus rhythm. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly poorer outcome with regard to the recurrence of AF in patients with ERAF (hazard ratio 1.7,P = 0.03) and in those with AF for more than 3 years (hazard ratio 1.6,P = 0.03). Despite treatment with sotalol, patients with ERAF had a significantly higher AF recurrence rate within the first day (13/26 [50%] vs 12/76 [16%],P < 0.01), but not during long-term follow-up (21/26 [81%] vs 52/76 [68%],P = 0.3). In contrast, patients with AF for more than 3 years had a similar AF recurrence rate within the first day (7/29 [24%] vs 18/73 [25%],P = 1.0), but a significantly higher recurrence rate during long-term follow-up (27/29 [93%] vs 46/73 [37%],P < 0.01). In conclusion, the occurrence of ERAF and long AF duration were independent predictors for AF recurrence after successful internal cardioversion. The difference in the time course of AF recurrence in patients with ERAF from those with long AF duration suggests distinct arrhythmogenic mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tse et al. (2003) conducted a cohort in persistent atrial fibrillation (n=124). Early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation (ERAF) vs. No ERAF was evaluated on recurrence of atrial fibrillation (HR 1.7, p=0.03). Early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion was associated with a significantly higher risk of overall AF recurrence (HR 1.7, P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: