Key result
The AI-Doctor system using an SVM-RBF model identified testing samples with 74.36% accuracy and 84% average precision, outperforming Logistic Regression.
Why the study?
Cardiovascular diseases cause the most fatalities globally, motivating the development of a virtual medical diagnosis system for areas devoid of medical services.
Does the AI-Doctor machine learning system accurately diagnose cardiovascular conditions from digital stethoscope sound signals?
Does the AI-Doctor machine learning system accurately diagnose cardiovascular conditions from digital stethoscope sound signals?
A machine learning system analyzing digital stethoscope sound signals achieved 74.36% accuracy in preliminary diagnosis, suggesting potential for remote cardiovascular screening in areas lacking medical services.
According to the WHO, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) cause the most fatalities. We want to establish a virtual medical diagnosis system that doctors can accomplish in places devoid of medical services using a digital stethoscope connected to the cloud (and a mobile device). In this research, we present a system called AI-Doctor that uses machine learning (ML) algorithms to analyze heart and adjacent organs sound signals to make a virtual preliminary diagnosis. AI-Doctor uses a digital stethoscope to capture and analyze sound signals in real time with a deployed trained model and responds through a mobile/web application and capture the feedback for re-tuning. The whole training pipeline can be deployed in any cloud platform (Azure services in this case) dealing with sound signals features extraction, imbalance data handling and bag of ML models. We found that Support Vector machines with Radial Basis Function kernel (SVM-RBF) identified testing samples with 74.36% accuracy and 84% average precision followed by Logistic Regression (LR) with 73.5% accuracy and 80% average precision.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adhikari et al. (2023) studied Cardiovascular diseases. AI-Doctor (SVM-RBF model) vs. Logistic Regression (LR) model was evaluated on Accuracy in identifying testing samples. The AI-Doctor system using an SVM-RBF model identified testing samples with 74.36% accuracy and 84% average precision, outperforming Logistic Regression.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: