Key result
Change Club trial shifts to remote self-measurement of Life's Simple 7 amid COVID-19.
Why the study?
Rural communities face higher risks of physical inactivity, poor diet, and chronic disease, which the Change Club cluster randomized trial sought to address before COVID-19 disrupted data collection.
Does the Change Club civic engagement intervention improve Life's Simple 7 cardiovascular health scores in rural communities?
Does the Change Club civic engagement intervention improve Life's Simple 7 cardiovascular health scores in rural communities?
Adapting clinical trial data collection to self-measurement and validated surveys during the COVID-19 pandemic allowed a rural community-based cardiovascular health trial to proceed while balancing scientific rigor and feasibility.
Self-reported Life's Simple 7 collection sustains rural CV trials amid disruptions; extends adaptive protocols for future crises while preserving rigor.
Rural communities are at higher risk for physical inactivity, poor dietary behaviors, and related chronic diseases and obesity. These disparities are largely driven by built environment, socioeconomic, and social factors. A community-based cluster randomized controlled trial of an intervention, the Change Club, aims to address some of these disparities via civic engagement for built environment change. Baseline data collection began in February 2020, only to be paused by the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, the investigators evaluated multiple approaches for collecting data when the study resumed, focusing on Life’s Simple 7, and additional anthropometric, physiologic, and behavioral outcomes in rural and micropolitan (<50,000 population) communities in Texas and New York. Life’s Simple 7 includes fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol, blood pressure, weight, physical activity, diet, and smoking. Rigor and feasibility were considered across a variety of in-person versus at-home measurement options. After a comprehensive input from participants, partners, staff, researchers, and the funding liaison, the study team chose self-measurement and use of validated questionnaires/surveys to measure the Life’s Simple 7 components. This case provides an example of how a study team might adjust data collection protocol during unexpected and acute events while giving consideration to rigor, feasibility, stakeholder views, and participants’ health and safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seguin‐Fowler et al. (2023) studied Chronic disease and obesity risk factors (n=2,260). Change Club (civic engagement for built environment change) vs. Control communities was evaluated on Change in the American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 composite cardiovascular health score at 24 months. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the study team modified the baseline data collection protocol from in-person objective measurements to self-measurement and validated surveys to assess Life's Simple 7.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: