Increasingly, electrochemical energy storage and conversion technologies are considered key enablers of a deep decarbonization of society. However, given the real possibility that these technologies may delay rather than advance climate action, it is crucial that policymakers, industry, and researchers actively engage in developing principles for more responsible or ‘convivial’ use of these technologies. We demonstrate how current electrochemical research and innovation in green hydrogen and CO2 utilization is embedded in orthodox political-economic discourses and infrastructures. As part of a technology assessment based on Zoellick and Bisht’s (2018) degrowth perspective, we explore examples of electrochemical innovation that could fit heterodox political-economic scenarios and present approaches for future interdisciplinary research on convivial electrochemical innovation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smit et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: