Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Dynamic slicing algorithms can greatly reduce the de-bugging effort by focusing the attention of the user on a rele-vant subset of program statements. In this paper we present the design and evaluation of three precise dynamic slicing algorithms called the full preprocessing (FP), no prepro-cessing (NP) and limited preprocessing (LP) algorithms. The algorithms differ in the relative timing of construct-ing the dynamic data dependence graph and its traversal for computing requested dynamic slices. Our experiments show that the LP algorithm is a fast and practical precise slicing algorithm. In fact we show that while precise slices can be orders of magnitude smaller than imprecise dynamic slices, for small number of slicing requests, the LP algo-rithm is faster than an imprecise dynamic slicing algorithm proposed by Agrawal and Horgan.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
University of Arizona
The University of Texas at Dallas
Add This Paper to Your Research Feed
Any time a new paper drops it will be there.
Zhang et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: