Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article proposes an alternating false data injection attack strategy, which can bypass the summation detector in cyber-physical systems. This attack strategy offsets the impact on historical residuals by constantly changing the attack direction, and therefore invalidates the summation detector integrating historical information to detect the well-designed stealthy attacks. In the simulation, the proposed attack strategy reduces the increment of cumulative summation of residuals by 70% compared to the classical stealthy attack strategy, and bypasses both the <tex-math notation="LaTeX">χ ²</tex-math> detector and the summation detector. Furthermore, from a more general perspective, by proposing an almost completely stealthy attack strategy to make the residual information almost unchanged, this article proves that residual based detection methods regardless of single-step residual based ones nor historical residual based ones cannot fully detect false data injection attacks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: