Optimality of ratio type estimation methods for population mean in the presence of missing data

This article proposes various Searls-type ratio imputation methods (STRIM) on the lines of Ahmed et al. (2006 Ahmed, M. S., O. Al-Titi, Z. Al-Rawi, and W. Abu-Dayyeh. 2006. Estimation of a population mean using different imputation methods. Stat. Trans. 7 (6):1247–1264. [Google Scholar]). It is a well-known fact that the optimal ratio type estimator attains the MSE of regression estimator (or optimal difference estimator) but while using Searls-type transformation (STT) (Searls (1964 Searls, D. T. 1964. The utilization of a known coefficient of variation in the estimation procedure. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 59:1225–1226.[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar])) this may not always happen. These STRIM are shown to perform better than the imputation procedures of Ahmed et al. (2006 Ahmed, M. S., O. Al-Titi, Z. Al-Rawi, and W. Abu-Dayyeh. 2006. Estimation of a population mean using different imputation methods. Stat. Trans. 7 (6):1247–1264. [Google Scholar]). The STRIM may even outperform the Searls type difference imputation methods (STDIM) proposed by us in our earlier work, Bhushan and Pandey (2016 Bhushan, S., and A. P. Pandey. 2016. Optimal imputation of the missing data for estimation of population mean. Journal of Statistics and Management System 19 (6):755–69.[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). This study is concluded with the numerical study along with the theoretical comparison.