Introduction: Researchers have proposed that predicting who is a likely placebo responder may help guide treatment allocations to treatment regimens that differ in intensity.Methods: We used data from the Treatment of Adolescent Depression Study (TADS) in which adolescents (n = 439) were randomized 1:1:1:1 to placebo, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), medications (MEDs), or their combination (COMB). We developed a prognostic index (PI) in the placebo group to predict self-reported (RADS) and observer-rated (CDRS) depression outcomes using elastic net regularization. We explored whether the PIs moderated outcomes in the treatment conditions.Results: PI-CDRS was predicted by multiple variables but it did not moderate outcomes. PI-RADS was predicted by baseline severity, age, sleep problems, expectations, maternal depression, and the action stage of change. It moderated outcomes such that there were treatment differences for less placebo-responsive patients. For participants prone to placebo response, type of treatment had no statistically significant impact on outcomes. Baseline depression severity accounted for this effect: treatment differences were small and non-significant for patients with milder depression but larger in more severely depressed patients.Discussion: Future work should investigate whether multiple variable explain outcomes beyond severity as well as complex interactions between severity and other variables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lorenzo‐Luaces et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: