Why the study?
The review aimed to examine the influence of acute stress on decision-making processes using EEG and fNIRS, identify affected brain regions, and explore feature extraction and classification methods.
Does acute stress affect decision-making processes and brain activity as measured by EEG and fNIRS?
Does acute stress affect decision-making processes and brain activity as measured by EEG and fNIRS?
EEG and fNIRS are potentially useful for detecting acute stress during decision-making, but standardized approaches are needed due to methodological heterogeneity.
Supports exploration of EEG and fNIRS for acute stress detection in decisions; leaves open standardization and validation in larger cohorts.
This systematic review provides a comprehensive analysis of studies that use electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to investigate how acute stress affects decision-making processes. The primary goal of this systematic review was to examine the influence of acute stress on decision making in challenging or stressful situations. Furthermore, we aimed to identify the specific brain regions affected by acute stress and explore the feature extraction and classification methods employed to enhance the detection of decision making under pressure. Five academic databases were carefully searched and 27 papers that satisfied the inclusion criteria were found. Overall, the results indicate the potential utility of EEG and fNIRS as techniques for identifying acute stress during decision-making and for gaining knowledge about the brain mechanisms underlying stress reactions. However, the varied methods employed in these studies and the small sample sizes highlight the need for additional studies to develop more standardized approaches for acute stress effects in decision-making tasks. The implications of the findings for the development of stress induction and technology in the decision-making process are also explained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdalhadi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: