Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores ILAC performance in IoT networks, indicating fundamental trade-offs in localization and communication.
For the Internet of things (IoT) network, the integrated localization and communication (ILAC) is expected to provide high localization and communication performance simultaneously. However, the existing research to evaluate the performance of ILAC systems fails to reveal the fundamental performance of ILAC systems in practical IoT network topology analytically. In this paper, we develop a unified analytical ILAC framework using stochastic geometry. We then validate the theoretical results obtained from the proposed analytical framework with the simulation results via extensive Monte Carlo simulations. We further analyse the communication coverage and localization coverage probability with respect to the network density, time-frequency-power domain resource allocation, and communication throughout and localization threshold. Finally, based on the ILAC simulation results, we reveal design guidance for ILAC systems. Specifically, we observe the fundamental trade-off between localization and communication performance attributed to the time-frequency-power domain resource allocation. Network density positively affects the ILAC performance, while power control is much less effective due to the dense network topology. The major observations are that time-domain (TD) resource allocation is preferred in dense networks with low localization CRB thresholds, while frequency-domain (FD) resource allocation dominates in sparse networks with large localization CRB thresholds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: