In the Faculty of Architecture, in Near East University, we had communication problems between students and open/off project valuation juries. These problems were due to; “Lack of common terminology”, “Subjective anxiety on evaluation of spatial quality and quantity”, “Difficulties in expressing positive, negative and missing parts of student studies, through the design process assessments”, “Problems of expression during information exchanges between project groups, etc”. Because of all such cases, a need for developing a method having “Common Criteria Scale for Project Assessment Decisions” is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uzunoğlu et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: