Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Built-In Self-Test (BIST) is less often applied to random logic than to embedded memories due to the following reasons: Firstly, for a satisfiable fault coverage it may be necessary to apply additional deterministic patterns, which cause additional hardware costs. Secondly, the BIST-signature reveals only poor diagnostic information. Recently, the first issue has been addressed successfully. The paper at hand proposes a viable, effective and cost efficient solution for the second problem. The paper presents a new method for Built-in Self-Diagnosis (BISD). The core of the method is an extreme response compaction architecture, which for the first time enables an autonomous on-chip evaluation of test responses with negligible hardware overhead. The key advantage of this architecture is that all data, which is relevant for a subsequent diagnosis, is gathered during just one test session. The BISD method comprises a hardware scheme, a test pattern generation approach and a diagnosis algorithm. Experiments conducted with industrial designs substantiate that the additional hardware overhead introduced by the BISD method is on average about 15% of the BIST area, and the same diagnostic resolution can be obtained as for external testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elm et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: