Why the study?
Does magnesium pre-treatment reduce infarct size in an isoprenaline-induced myocardial infarction rat model?
Does magnesium pre-treatment reduce infarct size in an isoprenaline-induced myocardial infarction rat model?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Single-dose magnesium prophylaxis did not reduce infarct size or prevent adverse hemodynamic and electrical changes in an isoprenaline-induced myocardial infarction rat model.
AIM: Magnesium (Mg(2+)) is effective in treating cardiovascular disorders such as arrhythmias and pre-eclampsia, but its role during myocardial infarction (MI) remains uncertain. In this study, we investigated the effects of Mg(2+)pre-treatment on isoprenaline (ISO) -induced MI in vivo. METHODS: Rats divided into four groups were each pre-treated with either MgSO4 (270 mg/kg intraperitoneally) or an equivalent volume of physiological saline, prior to the ISO (67 mg/kg subcutaneously) or saline treatments. One day post-treatment, the electrocardiogram and left ventricular blood pressures were recorded. Infarcts were determined using 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining, and serum markers of lipid peroxidation were measured with spectrophotometric assays. RESULTS: Mg(2+) pre-treatment neither altered the ISO-induced infarct size compared with ISO treatment alone (p > 0.05), nor reversed the low-voltage electrocardiogram or the prominent Q waves induced by ISO, despite a trend to decreased Q waves. Similarly, Mg(2+) did not prevent the ISO-induced decrease in peak left ventricular blood pressure or the decrease in minimal rate of pressure change. Mg(2+) did not reverse the ISO-induced gain in heart weight or loss of body weight. Neither ISO nor Mg(2+) altered the concentrations of lipid peroxidation markers 24 hours post MI induction. CONCLUSION: Although Mg(2+) had no detrimental effects on electrical or haemodynamic activity in ISO-induced MI, the lack of infarct prevention may detract from its utility in MI therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garson et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: