Why the study?
Coronary artery disease is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, and the potential of circulating lncRNAs LIPCAR and MALAT1 and miRNAs miR-142-3p and miR-155-5p to discriminate unstable from stable CAD patients required assessment.
Do elevated plasma levels of lncRNAs LIPCAR and MALAT1 predict unstable coronary artery disease and future MACE in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Do elevated plasma levels of lncRNAs LIPCAR and MALAT1 predict unstable coronary artery disease and future MACE in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Elevated circulating levels of lncRNAs LIPCAR and MALAT1 serve as potential diagnostic biomarkers for unstable angina and prognostic predictors for MACE in STEMI patients.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. In this study, we aimed to assess the potential of plasma long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) LIPCAR and MALAT1 and microRNAs (miRNAs) miR-142-3p and miR-155-5p to discriminate unstable CAD patients from stable ones. 23 stable angina (SA), 21 unstable angina (UA), and 50 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients were enrolled; their plasma was collected. ncRNA plasma levels were evaluated using RT-qPCR. All measured ncRNA levels were significantly increased in UA patients' plasma compared to SA patients' plasma and in STEMI-with major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) patients' plasma vs. STEMI-without MACE patients' plasma. ROC analysis showed that increased levels of LIPCAR and MALAT1 were associated with UA, and the prognostic model improved with the addition of miR-155-5p levels. The assessed lncRNAs discriminated between hyperglycemic (HG) and normoglycemic (NG) UA patients, and they were associated with MACE incidence in STEMI patients; this prediction was improved by the addition of miR-142-3p levels to the ROC multivariate model. We propose LIPCAR and MALAT1 as effective diagnostic markers for vulnerable CAD, their association with HG in UA patients, and as robust predictors for unfavorable evolution of STEMI patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barbălată et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: