Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Despite the challenges of managing type 1 diabetes, many adolescents achieve optimal outcomes. A validated measure of diabetes-specific strengths is needed to measure adaptive behaviors and attitudes associated with overcoming challenges and achieving “resilient” outcomes Baseline data from 260 adolescents (age 14–18 years, M = 15.7 ± 1.1, 60% female, 33% Non-Caucasian, M A1c = 9.1 ± 1.9%) and caregivers in a behavioral intervention trial were analyzed to evaluate psychometric properties of the 12-item self-report Diabetes Strengths and Resilience measure for adolescents (DSTAR-Teen). Reliability and validity were examined in relation to measures of related constructs, regimen adherence, and glycemic outcomes, and confirmatory factor analysis was conducted Reliability was good (internal consistency: α = .89; item-total correlations: r range = .55–.78). Significant correlations demonstrated construct and criterion validity. A two-factor structure reflecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes fit the data better than a one-factor solution The DSTAR-Teen has strong psychometric properties, captures adaptive aspects of adolescents’ diabetes management (i.e., “strengths”), and is related to clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hilliard et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: