Why the study?
Current cardiometabolic risk assessment relies mainly on current BMI, but individuals who have lost weight after obesity may maintain elevated metabolic risk.
Does a history of past obesity increase the risk of elevated HbA1c in adults despite current weight loss?
Does a history of past obesity increase the risk of elevated HbA1c in adults despite current weight loss?
A history of obesity imparts a lasting glycemic risk ('metabolic scarring') that is not captured by current BMI alone, highlighting the need to incorporate weight history into metabolic risk assessments.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prior obesity may confer persistent HbA1c elevation beyond current BMI; leaves open reversibility of metabolic scarring.
BACKGROUND: Conventional cardiometabolic risk assessment relies primarily on a patient's current body mass index, yet individuals who have lost weight after a period of obesity may continue to harbour elevated metabolic risk. We sought to quantify the persistent impact of past obesity on glycaemic control and to develop a clinical risk score that integrates weight history with current risk factors. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 15,422 adults (≥ 18 years) from the 2011-2020 NHANES cycles. Participants with complete self-reported weight history (highest adult weight, weight 1 year ago, number of ≥ 5% weight-loss episodes) and measured BMI were included. Metabolic scarring was defined by elevated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c ≥ 5.7%) or HOMA-IR ≥ 2.5. We applied inverse-probability-weighted logistic regression to estimate the association between prior obesity and current HbA1c, adjusting for confounders. We then refit a survey-weighted logistic model using age per decade, current BMI, weight-history category, sex and race/ethnicity, converting regression coefficients into an integer point-based score. Discrimination was evaluated by survey-weighted area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Formerly obese individuals exhibited significantly higher HbA1c than never-obese peers (adjusted β = 0.58%, p < 0.002), indicative of metabolic scarring. The derived risk score ranged from -31 to +90 points (median = 6; IQR = -3 to 16) and achieved an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI 0.77-0.81). Age per decade, BMI, and weight history contributed 4, 1 and up to 4 points, respectively; female sex and Non-Hispanic White race subtracted points. Calibration across predicted-risk deciles was excellent (slope = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: A history of obesity imparts a lasting glycemic risk that is not captured by current BMI alone. Our metabolic scarring risk score offers a pragmatic tool for identifying individuals at elevated metabolic risk despite weight normalisation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hemade et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: