Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CONTEXT: Calcitonin (CT) is the main medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) tumor marker. However, it has several limitations, including a concentration-dependent biphasic half-life, sensitivity to rapid in vitro degradation, and the presence of different isoforms/fragments. Procalcitonin (PCT), the prohormone of calcitonin, is free of these limitations but is currently used only as a sepsis marker. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to determine whether PCT is suited as a MTC tumor marker by comparing the diagnostic performance of PCT with that of CT in MTC. DESIGN: PCT and CT were measured in a total of 835 subjects, including normal volunteers (n = 197) and patients with active-MTC (n = 91), cured-MTC (n = 42), neuroendocrine tumors (n = 225), mastocytosis (n = 48), follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinoma (cured = 120, persistent/recurrent = 55), and benign thyroid disease (n = 57). RESULTS: PCT levels were significantly higher in the active-MTC patients (mean 126.4 ng/ml) than the cured-MTC patients (mean <0.1 ng/ml). The overall concordance between the two markers was 95.7% (kappa = 0.81). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed no significant difference in diagnostic performance between CT and PCT. PCT's diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 91 and 96%, respectively. The corresponding values for CT were 99 and 98%. Analyte stability studies showed that CT is very unstable in vitro with a decrease of 35-50% from the original value 24 h after the blood draw, whereas PCT levels did not significantly change during this time. CONCLUSIONS: A strong correlation was observed between PCT and CT levels in patients with MCT. Given PCT's greater analytical stability, we conclude that it represents a promising complementary MTC tumor marker.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Algeciras‐Schimnich et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: