PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026Journal of Environmental Management0 citationsOpen Access

Reducing carbon footprints in grassland-dominated milk production by rewetting of organic soils and intensified forage productivity on mineral soils

View Full Paper
AMAnna-Lena MüllerKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyGPGuillermo PardoBasque Centre for Climate ChangeSASylvia Helena AnnuthUniversity of Bayreuth

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how rewetting peatlands and intensifying forage on mineral soils can reduce carbon footprints in milk production.
  • Analyzed peatland share thresholds for effective forage production and carbon emissions
  • Compared potential forage surplus from mineral soil intensification against peatland rewetting deficits
  • Considered socio-economic implications of transitioning from drained peatland use
  • Intensification on mineral soils offers a potential forage surplus nearly double the deficit from peatland rewetting.
  • Additional emissions from intensified production and transport are minimal compared to the mitigation benefits.
  • Effective implementation requires EU agricultural policy incentives to support regional cooperation.

Abstract

) is identified at a peatland share of 21.8 %. Farms below this threshold can maintain forage production by intensifying mineral soils, while those exceeding it, such as high peat share farms (40% peatland), face structural shortfalls and can realistically rewet only half of their peatland area without production losses. At regional scale, a circular solution appears biophysically feasible. Aggregated results for the Ammer region indicate that the potential forage surplus from intensification on mineral soils exceeds deficits associated with peatland rewetting by nearly two-fold, while additional emissions from intensified production and increased transport remain small relative to mitigation gains. Practical implementation, however, needs to manage increased nitrogen losses on intensified mineral soils and account for site-specific socio-economic constraints. Realizing this transformation requires EU Common Agricultural Policy payments to incentivize regional cooperation and address associated socio-economic implications of transitioning away from drained peatland use, providing the necessary framework for integrating alternative land-use and restoration goals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Müller et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d20bc02fbce91306370c6https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.130028
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Denitrification in biogeochemical models—challenges and advances in simulating N 2 and N 2 O emission in agricultural systems2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2Greenhouse gas emissions from food systems: building the evidence base2021 · 386 citations
  3. 3Intensive grassland management disrupts below-ground multi-trophic resource transfer in response to drought2022 · 49 citations
  4. 4LandscapeDNDC: a process model for simulation of biosphere–atmosphere–hydrosphere exchange processes at site and regional scale2012 · 230 citations
  5. 5The Nitrogen Cascade2003 · 2,925 citations