PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026China Welding0 citationsOpen Access

Linear Friction Welding of Similar and Dissimilar A36 Mild Steel and AISI304 Stainless Steel

View Full Paper
NSNoorul Haque SabriFKFarhan Ahmad KhanNGNamrata Gangil

Key Points

  • The research aims to evaluate the joint integrity and mechanical properties of linear friction welded A36 mild steel and AISI304 stainless steel.
  • Utilized linear friction welding under varying forging pressures for joining stainless steel and mild steel.
  • Employed scanning electron microscopy, optical microscopy, and Vickers hardness testing for microstructural and mechanical property analysis.
  • Investigated the effects of forging pressure on grain size and hardness profiles of the welds.
  • Grain size in the weld centre zone of mild steel refined from 7.11 µm to 3.59 µm compared to base metal.
  • Maximum hardness recorded was 491 HV in dissimilar welds and 354.5 HV in similar welds.
  • Observed chevron-shaped flow patterns at interfaces indicating thermomechanical effects.

Abstract

The application of Stainless Steel (SS) and Mild Steel (MS) is a popular pair across several industrial sectors including aviation, automobile, and nuclear power. The joining of this dissimilar pair with good joint integrity in varied shapes and sizes is critical and challenging. The Linear Friction Welding (LFW) is an effective solid-state joining technique to address this issue. The reports the results on microstructural features and mechanical properties of SS-SS as well as SS-MS dissimilar LFW joints. A comparison of similar and dissimilar LFW joint is also presented to showcase the joint evolution. The joints were fabricated using LFW under varying forging pressures. To analyze the microstructural evolution in the weld zone and at weld interfaces Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), optical microscopy, and Vickers hardness testing were employed. The grain size in the weld centre zone (WCZ)of MS was refined from 7.11 µm to 3.59 µm and the pearlite content was found to be higher as compared to the base metal (BM). A distinct chevron-shaped flow pattern was observed at the interface of a similar weld. This pattern is driven by the severe thermomechanical extrusion of highly sheared viscoplastic layers during welding. Furthermore, SEM analysis revealed homogeneous carbon diffusion near the WCZ in both welds. The hardness profile of the welds was closely correlated with these microstructural features. The highest hardness of 491 HV was measured in WCZ in dissimilar and 354.5 HV in similar welds. The macrostructure and flash formation were found to be directly influenced by the BM properties and applied forging pressure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sabri et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d218f02fbce91306377fchttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cwe.2026.100055
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Microstructure control of medium carbon steel joints by low-temperature linear friction welding2019 · 73 citations
  2. 2Linear friction welding of Al–Cu Part 2 – Interfacial characteristics2011 · 30 citations
  3. 3Nonuniformity in Mechanical Properties of Linear Friction Welded Mild Steel Joint2019 · 5 citations
  4. 4The Impact of Process Parameters on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Stainless Steel/Carbon Steel Clad Rebar2019 · 20 citations
  5. 5The microstructure and mass transport during friction welding of ductile cast iron2013 · 11 citations