PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Distinguishing climate change worry from state climate anxiety across 32 countries: implications for subjective wellbeing

ELEun Hee LeeUniversity of Nottingham Malaysia CampusCOCharles A. OgunbodeUniversity of NottinghamSASibele AquinoUniversidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie

Key Points

  • This research examines how climate change worry and state climate anxiety are linked to subjective wellbeing measures.
  • Survey data collected from 32 countries (N=12,246)
  • Assessment using WHO-5 Wellbeing Index and life satisfaction metrics
  • Comparison of emotional responses to climate change on mental health outcomes
  • State climate anxiety shows a stronger association with WHO-5 Wellbeing Index (p < 0.01)
  • State climate anxiety shows a stronger link with life satisfaction compared to climate change worry
  • Highlights the need for differentiated climate messaging strategies based on emotional responses

Abstract

Abstract The concepts of “climate change worry” and “climate change anxiety” are often used interchangeably in climate research, but they may reflect distinct emotional responses to climate change, which could potentially have different implications for public mental health. This research brief aims to empirically examine the differences between these two constructs by comparing their associations with key indicators of subjective wellbeing. Using survey data from 32 countries ( N = 12,246), we compared how strongly climate change worry and state climate anxiety were each associated with subjective wellbeing, as measured by the WHO-5 Wellbeing Index and life satisfaction. State climate anxiety showed stronger associations with both WHO-5 Wellbeing Index and life satisfaction than climate change worry. This underscores the importance of treating the two as distinct emotional responses, each with different implications for public wellbeing. These insights are especially relevant for policymakers and climate communicators, who must carefully consider the emotional tone of climate messaging to foster constructive engagement while safeguarding the psychological wellbeing of the public.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d22db02fbce913063892fhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-026-01120-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper