The regulatory use of banks’ internal models makes capital requirements more risk sensitive but invites regulatory arbitrage. I develop a framework to study bank regulation with strategic selection of risk models. A bank supervisor can discourage arbitrage by auditing risk models and implements capital ratios less risk sensitive than in the first-best to reduce auditing costs. The optimal capital ratios of a national supervisor can be different from those set by supranational authorities, in which case the supervisor optimally tolerates biased models. I discuss the empirical implications of this “hidden model” problem, and policy answers such as leverage ratios and more reliance on backtesting mechanisms. The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2898 . This paper was accepted by Amit Seru, finance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jean-Édouard Colliard (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: