OBJECTIVE: The current review synthesizes communication intervention studies that involved the use of speech-generating devices (SGD) for children with autism. METHODS: Twenty-three studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria following systematic searches of electronic databases, journals and reference lists. Studies were evaluated in terms of: (a) participants, (b) setting, (c) mode of communication, (d) communication skill(s) taught to the participant, (e) intervention procedures, (f) outcomes, (g) follow-up and generalization, (h) reliability and treatment integrity and (i) design and certainty of evidence. RESULTS: Intervention, most commonly targeting requesting skills, was provided to a total of 51 children aged 3-16 years. Intervention strategies followed two main approaches: operant/behavioural techniques and naturalistic teaching procedures. Positive outcomes were reported for 86% of the studies and 78% of the studies were categorized as providing conclusive evidence. CONCLUSION: The literature base suggests that SGDs are viable communication options for children with autism. However, several areas warrant future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meer et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: