Why the study?
Effective use of VKAs is challenging in RHD-associated AF, but until recently no data evaluated rivaroxaban as an alternative in this population.
Does once-daily rivaroxaban reduce cardiovascular events compared to dose-adjusted VKA in patients with rheumatic heart disease-associated atrial fibrillation?
Does once-daily rivaroxaban reduce cardiovascular events compared to dose-adjusted VKA in patients with rheumatic heart disease-associated atrial fibrillation?
In patients with rheumatic heart disease-associated atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban is inferior to vitamin K antagonists, leading to higher rates of ischemic events and mortality without reducing major bleeding.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rivaroxaban associated with shorter event-free survival than VKA in rheumatic AF; leaves open whether this reflects true inferiority or residual confounding in Level 5 data.
INTRODUCTION: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains a major healthcare problem. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the commonest sustained arrhythmia in RHD, leading to major complications and morbidity in a young population. Currently, anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) is the mainstay of therapy for the prevention of thromboembolic adverse events. However, effective use of VKA remains challenging, especially in developing countries, showing a need for alternatives. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including rivaroxaban, could form a safe and effective alternative to fulfil a major unmet need in RHD patients with AF. However, until recently, no data was available for the use rivaroxaban in patients with rheumatic heart disease associated AF. Study and Results: The INVICTUS trial was conducted to assess efficacy and safety of once-daily rivaroxaban compared with a dose-adjusted VKA for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with RHD-associated AF. A total of 4531 patients (age: 50.5 ± 14.6 years) were followed for 3.1 ± 1.2 years in which 560/2292 patients in the rivaroxaban group and 446/2273 in the VKA group had a primary-outcome adverse event. The restricted mean survival time was 1599 days in the rivaroxaban group and 1675 days in the VKA group (difference, -76 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], -121 to -31; P <0.001). A higher incidence of death occurred in the rivaroxaban group than in the VKA group (restricted mean survival time, 1608 days vs. 1680 days; difference, -72 days; 95% CI, -117 to -28). No significant between-group difference in the rate of major bleeding was noted. LESSONS LEARNED: The INVICTUS trial shows that Rivaroxaban is inferior to Vitamin K-antagonists in patients with RHD associated AF as VKA therapy led to a lower rate of ischemic and lower mortality due to vascular causes, without significantly increasing the rate of major bleeding. The results support current guidelines, which recommend vitamin K antagonist therapy for the prevention of stroke in patients with RHD associated AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Susy Kotit (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: