In this time of rapidly increasing interest in assessing the quality of medical care, many investigators, including myself, spend much time advocating their favorite method of evaluation. A refreshing and objective analysis of five methods is presented in this issue of the Journal by Brook and Appel in the Special Article, "Quality of Care Assessment: Choosing a method for peer review."In this study, the authors have collected data for the assessment of the quality of medical care provided to 296 patients with urinary-tract infection, hypertension or peptic ulcer. The assessment of quality was done by a team of physicians . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John Williamson (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: