Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the magnitude, determinants, and outcomes of adolescent pregnancy by combining data from previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses. DATA SOURCES: Online databases. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. METHODS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and Google Scholar, which reported the magnitude, predictors, and/or outcomes of adolescent pregnancy, were searched. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews. A weighted inverse variance random-effects model was used to determine the pooled estimates. In addition, subgroup heterogeneity, publication bias, and sensitivity were assessed. RESULTS: = 61.3%), preeclampsia/eclampsia, (adjusted odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-2.55), preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-2.40), and low birthweight (adjusted odds ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.66) were found to be significant complications of adolescent pregnancy in a global context. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of adolescent pregnancy varied significantly across previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The key determinants identified included low socioeconomic status, rural residency, a history of abuse, early marriage, and no contraceptive use. The complications associated with adolescent pregnancy included anemia, stillbirth, preeclampsia/eclampsia, preterm birth, and low birthweight. To reduce the burden of adolescent pregnancy, collaborative efforts are required from global, regional, and local stakeholders, such as policymakers and reproductive health program planners, through health education and training that focus on the most vulnerable populations.
Abate et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: