Why the study?
How do environmental factors and secular events affect outcomes in a school-based cardiovascular health promotion trial?
How do environmental factors and secular events affect outcomes in a school-based cardiovascular health promotion trial?
Process evaluation tools like the School Health Questionnaire are important for isolating the impact of behavioral interventions from competing environmental factors in multicenter trials.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid trial interpretation by tracking environmental influences; leaves open validation in broader cardiovascular prevention studies.
The Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH) is a multicenter trial designed to test the effectiveness of school and family-based cardiovascular health promotion for preadolescents. CATCH interventions target multiple cardiovascular health behaviors such as dietary intake of fat and sodium, physical activity, and tobacco use. Evaluation includes physiological, psychosocial, behavioral, and process measures. An important aspect of the process evaluation is the assessment of environmental factors and "secular events" in both intervention and control schools that may affect outcomes independently of the CATCH interventions. With such information, CATCH investigators are able to isolate the impact of the CATCH intervention from competing (non-CATCH) factors as well as "track" proximal (i.e., immediate and short term) changes related to the intervention that may in turn lead to "distal" (long-term) behavior change. The School Health Questionnaire, the major process evaluation tool for monitoring secular and environmental changes in the schools, is described in detail, and data describing tobacco-related environmental factors and secular events are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elder et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: