Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the reliability of heart rate variability indices and different approaches for 5-minute interval selection in futsal players.
Are heart rate variability indices reliable in under-20 futsal players across different days and interval selection methods?
Are heart rate variability indices reliable in under-20 futsal players across different days and interval selection methods?
HRV indices such as RRmean, lnRMSSD, lnHF, and LFnu show acceptable reliability in futsal players, particularly when using the final 5 minutes of a 15-minute recording.
Supports standardized HRV protocols in young futsal players; leaves open validation and outcome links in broader athletic groups.
The main aim the present study was evaluated the reliability of the heart rate variability (HRV) indices in futsal players. Additionally the study verifi ed the reliability of different approaches for 5 min interval selection of recording. Eighteen under-20 futsal players underwent 15 min of pre-training RR interval recordings in two different day. Time and frequency domain and Poincaré Plot indices were tested. The indices were calculated using: 1) fi nal 5 min of recording; 2) 5 min of lower variance of recording, by a mathematical algorithm; 3) 5 min segment of lower variance, by an experienced operator. The HRV indices presented a wide range reliability [e.g. RRmean (ICC=0.96, SEM=3.4ms, CV=2.6%), lnRMSSD (ICC=0.88, SEM=5.9ms, CV=4.3%), lnHF (ICC=0.89, SEM=7.5ms, CV=5.9%), LFnu (ICC=0.84, SEM=13ms, CV=9.4%), LF (ICC=0.47, SEM=65.2ms,CV=38.5%) and LF/HF (ICC=0.63, SEM=83.7ms, CV=54.5%)]. The fi nal 5 min of recording was the most reliable. The results suggest that most of HRV indices presented acceptable reliability, however the RRmean, lnRMSSD, lnHF and LFnu were the most reliable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paludo et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: