PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1996Cardiovascular Research162 citationsOpen Access

Short- and long-term reproducibility of time and frequency domain heart rate variability measurements in normal subjects

View Full Paper
MPMaria Vittoria Pitzalis

Structured PICO

Are time and frequency domain heart rate variability measurements from 10-min ECG recordings reproducible over short and long terms in normal subjects?

P
Population
18 normal volunteers
I
Intervention
10-min ECG recordings under three different conditions: rest, controlled respiration, and after a passive head-up tilt test, evaluated at baseline, 2 weeks, and 7 months
C
Comparator
Baseline values compared with results at 2 weeks and 7 months
O
Outcome
Reproducibility of time and frequency domain heart rate variability measurements evaluated by interclass correlation coefficient (ICC)surrogate

The reproducibility of frequency domain HRV parameters from 10-min ECGs depends heavily on the physiological condition (rest, controlled respiration, or tilt), which is critical when evaluating drug effects.

Abstract

Objective: To obtain data relating to the reproducibility of the time and frequency domain measurements obtained from 10-min ECG recordings. Methods: Eighteen normal volunteers underwent evaluations of time and frequency domain heart rate variability 2 weeks and 7 months after baseline analysis. The time domain parameters were mean NN, the standard deviation of NN intervals, the percentage of successive NN intervals >50 ms and the root mean square successive difference of NN intervals. The frequency domain evaluations (total power, low frequency, and high frequency) were made by means of both the Fast Fourier Transform algorithm (FFT) and the autoregressive method (AR) from 10-min ECG recordings made under three different conditions: rest, controlled respiration, and after a passive head-up tilt test. Reproducibility was evaluated by means of the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), comparing baseline values with the results obtained at the second week and the seventh month. Time domain evaluation were also made from 10-min ECG. Results: All of the time domain measurements had an ICC ≥ 0.75, except for the standard deviation of NN intervals, which had an ICC of 0.57. The frequency domain parameters obtained by means of either FFT or AR showed similar reproducibility. Low frequency was reproducible under all three conditions, total power only at rest, and high frequency only during controlled respiration. Conclusion: The reproducibility of frequency domain parameters depends on the analysed condition. These results are of primary importance when the effects of drugs or other interventions on heart rate variability are under investigation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maria Vittoria Pitzalis (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d33e843708a372d5de3echttps://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6363(96)00086-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Analysis of Heart Rate Variability1973 · 949 citations
  2. 2An Analysis of Heart Rate Variability1973 · 223 citations
  3. 3Intraindividual Reproducibility of Heart Rate Variability1992 · 71 citations
  4. 4Day-to-day reproducibility of time-domain measures of heart rate variability in survivors of acute myocardial infarction1995 · 24 citations
  5. 5Effects of low dose transdermal scopolamine on heart rate variability in acute myocardial infarction1993 · 61 citations