I began writing the original version of this book some fifteen years ago.This new version retains the basic structure of the first edition, but contains hardly a single sentence which is the same as in that edition.I have in fact totally rewritten the book, extending the scope and detail of the arguments, taking in issues which have become philosophically alive in the interim, and incorporating the results of more recent historical research.The main change of focus of the book is in relation to the development in America of sophisticated work in pragmatism and neo-Hegelianism, which draws both on the traditions investigated in this book and on resources from recent analytical philosophy.Though I obviously would say this, I do think any reader of the first edition would profit considerably from reading (and, preferably, buying!) the new edition.The previous edition was generally well received by the reviewers, but one or two rightly commented on its stylistic failings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 1991 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: