In wireless sensor networks (WSNs) energy efficiency and communication reliability are often conflicting requirements. Additionally, some application areas such as industrial automation or infrastructure monitoring impose strict latency bounds. Low-power receivers (<; 1 mW power consumption) together with adapted MAC protocols have the potential to meet these diverse requirements. We present an overview of state-of-the-art low-power receivers and relate their characteristics to requirements for different application areas. We compare low-power receivers to duty-cycled transceivers and present applications depending on them. For this, we use power consumption, sensitivity, and data rate as key performance figures for low-power receivers. Based on the characteristics of the applications we derive guidelines for using low-power receivers instead of duty-cycled transceivers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blanckenstein et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: