[1] Today's atmospheric global circulation models can represent the effects of clouds through “conventional” parameterizations on coarse grids, through the use of global high-resolution grids, or through the use of embedded cloud-resolving models as superparameterizations in a lower resolution global model. Recent work on conventional parameterizations has been aimed at improving the representation of entrainment, including nondeterministic effects, and achieving resolution independence. Global high-resolution grids have been very useful for studying the interaction of clouds with the global circulation out to time scales of about one simulated year; longer simulations are not yet feasible. Superparameterizations have already been used in simulations longer than a century and have succeeded in simulating the Madden-Julian Oscillation, the diurnal cycle of precipitation, and other phenomena that have presented challenges for conventionally parameterized models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David A. Randall (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: