Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the role of echocardiographic myocardial work and determine its utility for the early diagnosis of cardiotoxicity.
Does myocardial work by echocardiography accurately diagnose early cardiotoxicity in adult patients undergoing chemotherapy?
Does myocardial work by echocardiography accurately diagnose early cardiotoxicity in adult patients undergoing chemotherapy?
Myocardial work indices by echocardiography demonstrate high specificity and may serve as an early diagnostic tool for chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity before LVEF declines.
Aim: Evaluate the role of myocardial work by echocardiography and determine its utility as an early diagnosis of cardiotoxicity. Methods: Single-center included 180 patients over 18 years old undergoing chemotherapy, the definition of cardiotoxicity for this study was to observe a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 50% and, or a global longitudinal strain (GLS) less than 16%. With these parameters, we divided the population into two groups, with cardiotoxicity and without cardiotoxicity. ROC curves were performed to determine the best cut-off point for global myocardial work to define cardiotoxicity. 2 × 2 tables were made to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Results: Cardiotoxicity was established by obtaining cutoff points for global myocardial work index (GWI) with values lower than 1,381.5 mmHg%, Global Constructive Work (GCW) of 1,722 mmHg%, and myocardial efficiency [Global Work Efficiency (GWE)] of 88.5%, with a sensitivity (58.8%, 65.6%, and 52.9%) and specificity (91.8%, 82.1%, and 89.6%) respectively. Conclusions: We propose the measurement of myocardial work as a diagnostic tool for cardiotoxicity, as it has good specificity and negative predictive value, serving as an early diagnostic tool for cardiotoxicity without waiting for a decrease in LVEF and without being a marker influenced by loading conditions, in patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cortes-Pérez et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: