Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Model was developed by two-level five-factor full-factorial designed-experiment to predict arsenic removal from contaminated water by electrocoagulation. Five factors, namely arsenic concentration (As), solution volume (V) ; current (I) , electrode area (A) , and current processing time (t) were investigated. Among the factors, arsenic concentration (As) and volume (V) have negative effect, and area (A) , time (t) , and current (I) have positive effect on arsenic removal. Within the studied levels of the factors, variance analysis at 5% significance level indicated that electrode area is not significant in arsenic removal by electrocoagulation. The model predicted reasonably good arsenic removal (error<2%) from low (0.288 mg/L) and high (0.882 mg/L) initial arsenic concentrations in presence of naturally cooccurring solutes in the groundwater. For the range of operating variables studied, optimum removal of arsenic (98.56%) is obtained at higher arsenic concentration (1.18 mg/L), lower volume (1 L), higher current (3 A), and higher current processing time (120 s).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Majumder et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: