This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Substance use in parents is a common reason for child welfare system involvement (CWS). Stigma associated with substance use and disorders (SU/D) continues to negatively impact individuals; however, less is understood about the intersecting stigma of CWS involvement and SU/D. The current study seeks to understand parents' experiences of stigma related to SU/D and CWS involvement as well as the drivers and consequences of stigma at multiple socioecological levels using the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework. Methods: Qualitative data analysis was conducted on semi-structured interviews with N = 31 Child Welfare System (CWS) personnel (90.3 % female; 96.8 % White, Non-Hispanic), N = 28 SU/D service providers (85.7 % female; 67.9 % White; 89.3 % Non-Hispanic), and N = 28 parents (89.3 % female; 78.6 % White; 89.3 % Non-Hispanic) with a current or recent CWS case due to SU/D. Results: Stigma drivers included a lack of understanding of SU/D at interpersonal, community, and organizational levels; negative stereotypes of parents with SU/D involved in CWS (seen as dishonest, unmotivated, poor parents); community neglect of SU/D; negative attitudes towards SU/D medications and harm reduction; and CWS policies unsupportive of SU/D. Parents described experiences of stigma by CWS and the healthcare system, their communities, and loved ones, leading to social isolation and hesitancy to engage in services. Consequently, stigma impacted SU/D service availability, housing/employment policies, and CWS practices, further negatively impacting parents. Conclusion: Parents with SU/D and involved in CWS have unique experiences of stigmatization related to both SU/D and CWS involvement. Findings point to multiple targets for stigma reduction at different socioecological levels.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dir et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: