PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1987Annals of Neurology270 citations

Magnetic brain stimulation: Central motor conduction studies in multiple sclerosis

View Full Paper
CHChristian HeßKMKerry MillsNMN.M.F. Murray

Key Points

  • The aim was to evaluate central motor conduction in patients with multiple sclerosis and correlate findings with clinical signs.
  • Evaluated 83 patients with multiple sclerosis and 32 normal subjects.
  • Measured central motor conduction time using magnetic and electrical stimulation.
  • Correlated findings with clinical evaluations and various evoked potentials.
  • Central motor conduction was abnormal in 60 out of 83 patients (72%) with multiple sclerosis.
  • Correlation found between abnormal CMC and brisk finger flexor jerks (p < 0.005).
  • 79% of patients with weakness had abnormal CMC, and 54% with normal muscle also showed abnormalities.

Abstract

Central motor conduction (CMC) was evaluated in 32 normal subjects and 83 patients with multiple sclerosis, and the findings were correlated with clinical signs and evoked potential data. CMC time was obtained from the latency difference in responses from the abductor muscle of the little finger to magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex and electrical stimulation at the C-7/T-1 interspace. Mean CMC time in normal subjects was 6.2 msec (SD 0.86 msec), and amplitudes of responses to cortical stimuli were at least 18% of those obtained with stimuli at the wrist. CMC was abnormal in 60 patients with multiple sclerosis (72%); this correlated well with brisk finger flexor jerks (p less than 0.005). CMC was abnormal in 79% of patients with weakness of the abductor muscle of the little finger and in 54% with a normal muscle. Neurological examination was normal in 7 arms with abnormal CMC. Visual evoked potentials were abnormal in 67%, somatosensory evoked potentials in 59%, and brainstem auditory evoked potentials in 39% of those tested. For each procedure more subjects had abnormal CMC and normal evoked potentials than the reverse. The technique is of value for demonstrating and documenting central motor pathway lesions in multiple sclerosis, especially when physical signs are equivocal.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Heß et al. (1987) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d3e20ba3016ff712f4ed5https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410220611
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Corpus Callosum–Mediated Interhemispheric Interactions in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy2024
  2. 2Beta-band corticomuscular coherence: a novel biomarker of functional corticospinal tract integrity and motor recovery after stroke.2025
  3. 3Corticomuscular Coherence in Post-Stroke Motor Function and Recovery2026
  4. 4Cervicomedullary motor evoked responses in individuals with severe chronic hemiparesis post-stroke: a feasibility study2026
  5. 5TMS-EEG signatures of motor network dysfunction in multiple sclerosis2026