Summary The story of the P hilistines as M ycenaean or A egean migrants, refugees who fled the A egean after the collapse of the palace societies c .1200 BC , bringing an A egean culture and practices to the E astern M editerranean, is well known. Accepted as essentially true by some, yet rejected as little more than a modern myth by others, the migration narrative retains a central place in the archaeology and historiography of the E astern M editerranean in the Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age ( LBA / EIA ). In recent years, and despite an increasingly shaky theoretical basis, the migration hypothesis has nevertheless seemed to drown out other interpretations and characterizations of the period, claiming a normative position that is undeserved. In this paper I explore the continuing power of this nineteenth century narrative and seek to show why it is less convincing than its prominent status would suggest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guy D. Middleton (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: