This study aims to understand the resolution of Islamic economic disputes through litigation in Religious Courts and analyze the position of DSN-MUI Fatwas in court proceedings. The focus is on a case between KJKS BMT Berkah Al-Fath Mulia and Fahmi Akbar Idries Bin Ahmad Mudjib regarding breach of contract (wanprestasi) and surety liability (Borgtocht), adjudicated by the Yogyakarta Religious Court under case number 386/Pdt.G/2021/PA.YK. The research employs a normative method with a library research approach. The collected data is analyzed descriptively to explain the role of DSN-MUI Fatwas in legal considerations for resolving Islamic economic disputes. The findings reveal that the judge utilized DSN-MUI Fatwas in legal considerations as written doctrines reflecting Islamic principles and societal values. In this case, DSN-MUI Fatwa Number 07/DSN/MUI/IV/2000 on mudharabah financing was used to strengthen other legal considerations permissible under legal provisions. This research contributes to clarifying the role of DSN-MUI Fatwas as legal guidelines in resolving Islamic economic disputes in Religious Courts. It enhances understanding of the integration of Islamic law into Indonesia's judicial system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sa’i et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: