Why the study?
The real incidence of sudden death risk in athletes diagnosed with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome or pattern was unknown.
Electrophysiological study identifies a significant proportion (20.23%) of athletes with WPW at risk for sudden death, which can be effectively treated with radiofrequency ablation to allow safe resumption of sports.
Electrophysiological evaluation may identify sudden death risk in athletes with WPW; leaves open whether routine use improves outcomes in prospective studies.
Sudden death (SD) in athletes is a potential avoidable dramatic scenario. When done regularly, cardiological evaluation increases the chances of diagnosing ventricular pre-excitation. Consequently, the following question arises: what is the real incidence of SD risk in athletes with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome/pattern? This study included 84 consecutive patients diagnosed with WPW and was designed as a retrospective analysis of data acquired between 2011 and 2021 to answer this question. The patients were evaluated using a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography, stress test, and electrophysiological study (EPS). The SD risk linked to WPW was defined as ≥ 1 of the following: the anterograde effective refractory period (AERP) of the accessory pathway (AP) ≤ 250 ms, atrial fibrillation (AF) with the shortest RR pre-excited interval ≤ 250 ms, syncope during AF or atrioventricular reentry tachycardia. The athletes with WPW pattern (n=25) or syndrome (n=59) at risk of SD were identified and treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The mean age was 19.83 (10–29) years; 66.6% were men. Seventeen athletes (n=17; 20.23%) were found with SD risk: 15 (n=15; 17.85%) in the WPW syndrome group and 2 (n=2; 2.38%) in the WPW pattern group. During the EPS, n=4 developed syncope: 1 during antidromic tachycardia and 3 during pre-excited AF. RFA was curative in 96.42% of cases. The EPS is mandatory to identify athletes with short AERP APs linked to an increased risk of SD. RFA is the intervention that settles the patients into a risk-free area, allowing resumption of sports shortly afterward.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Negru et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: